{"id":829,"date":"2016-05-19T02:18:41","date_gmt":"2016-05-19T08:18:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/?p=829"},"modified":"2016-05-19T02:18:41","modified_gmt":"2016-05-19T08:18:41","slug":"web-2-0-television-is-evolving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/2016\/05\/19\/web-2-0-television-is-evolving\/","title":{"rendered":"Web 2.0 &#8211; Television is Evolving"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"> Television has limited itself greatly by not having user agency for viewing like YouTube does. When an entire \u201clibrary\u201d of media is accessible at any time or mood, this is very convenient and attractive for viewers. By staying on a regulated programming that is timed and not user friendly, television has limited itself. YouTube however offers \u201c<\/span><span class=\"s2\">a significant shift in agency (producer-controlled flow as distinct from user-generated flow), and a shift from flow as default to flow as a condition that requires active selection\u201d (<\/span><span class=\"s3\">Uricchio <\/span><span class=\"s2\">33). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s4\"> Also, YouTube\u2019s collaborative aspect of encouraged participation and recommendation based off of previous viewings is very convenient for viewers. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">YouTube \u201chas launched a number of initiatives that seek to restore notions of collectivity\u201d (Uricchio 34). With features like the comment section that encourages audiences to vocalize their opinions on the work, as well as, inspire reaction videos to those comments. Not to mention, videos are sharable and connect people that have common interests like people who enjoy watching cat videos. Even \u201cYouTube\u2019s collaborative annotation system enables users to invite people to create speech bubbles, notes and spotlights on their videos\u201d (Uricchio 34). Now much like concerts for musicians, YouTube has thousands of\u00a0meet ups with\u00a0popular &#8220;Youtubers&#8221; and\u00a0their fans to actual conferences like VidCon. The interactivity of Youtube is truly unmatcha<\/span><span class=\"s1\">ble.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-831\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/p615575215-3.jpg\" alt=\"p615575215-3\" width=\"580\" height=\"387\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/p615575215-3.jpg 580w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/p615575215-3-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px\" \/> <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-832\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014\" width=\"676\" height=\"451\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Our2ndLife_at_VidCon_2014-676x451.jpg 676w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"> The thing television had going for itself in 2009 when William Uricchio wrote this essay \u201cThe Future of a Medium Once Known as Television,\u201d was its unique access to liveliness. Uricchio wrote that &#8220;if one searches on YouTube for live television, one is prompted with subcategories such as &#8216;bloopers, mistakes, accidents, gone wrong, and fights&#8217;\u2014indications that liveness is understood by YouTube\u2019s minions as an excess of signification that cannot be cleaned up, edited away or reshot&#8221; (32). However, inaccessibility to live content on YouTube is no longer the case. Now even YouTube has live showings from news, to gaming, to sports, etc.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-830\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Screen-Shot-2016-05-19-at-2.56.41-AM-1024x494.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-05-19 at 2.56.41 AM\" width=\"676\" height=\"326\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Screen-Shot-2016-05-19-at-2.56.41-AM-1024x494.png 1024w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Screen-Shot-2016-05-19-at-2.56.41-AM-300x145.png 300w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Screen-Shot-2016-05-19-at-2.56.41-AM-768x371.png 768w, https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/25\/2016\/05\/Screen-Shot-2016-05-19-at-2.56.41-AM-676x326.png 676w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It seems the television industry has greatly limited itself, and YouTube is utilizing this as advantage to gain more clients. <\/span><span class=\"s3\">Youtube\u2019s \u201cnotion of liveness is one of simulation and \u201con demand\u201d; its embrace of flow is selective and user-generated; and its sense of community and connection is networked and drawn together through recommendation, annotation and prompts&#8221; (Uricchio 35).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.5\">However, this article is assuming that streaming is not a form of television. Streaming sites, like Netflix, were not popular when this article was first released, yet now, streaming sites could very likely replace traditional\u00a0television all together. I would argue that streaming is an evolved form of television that has occurred due to the necessary demand.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"> Consumers want the accessibility of YouTube that is much like a library that one can easily select from. Though Netflix does not yet have live viewing, YouTube does, leaving traditional television as\u00a0unnecessary. The sense of community that YouTube capitalizes on is not the same as it for streaming sites. Streaming sites\u2019 communities have come less from interactive set ups created by the site, and\u00a0instead from the limited quantity of available content. It is not uncommon to hear from a friend \u201chave you seen this show on Netflix?\u201d that starts a conversation and sense of community. It is so common to watch Netflix in today&#8217;s society, that even the term \u201cNetflix and chill\u201d refers to an\u00a0interest in having sex with someone. It is in this new developed form of &#8220;television&#8221; that these networks will keep up with &#8220;consumers&#8217; changing needs.&#8221; Who knows maybe even streaming sites like Netflix will one day have a comment section?<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Television has limited itself greatly by not having user agency for viewing like YouTube does. When an entire \u201clibrary\u201d of media is accessible at any time or mood, this is very convenient and attractive for viewers. By staying on a regulated programming that is timed and not user friendly, television has limited itself. YouTube however [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":157,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/157"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=829"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":834,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/829\/revisions\/834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.dwrl.utexas.edu\/visualrhetoric\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}