When it comes to the definition of the term \u201cwild,\u201d many dictionaries would agree that \u201cwild\u201d means something along the lines of undomesticated species. For example, Merriam-Webster defines \u201cwild\u201d as \u201cnot inhabited or cultivated\u201d and \u201cnot subject to restraint or regulation.\u201d Within these definitions, it is clear that scholars are typically in agreement that \u201cwild\u201d is essentially the opposite of civilized ways of living. Furthermore, the Cambridge dictionary defines \u201cwild\u201d as being \u201cuncontrolled, violent, or extreme,\u201d a far more intense perspective of the term in question. Overall, the definition of \u201cwild” seems to limit its function to describe the abnormal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While these definitions of \u201cwild\u201d characterize this term as the opposite of the norm, I would respectfully have to disagree. In my own view, the term \u201cwild\u201d essentially creates its own definition of \u201cnormal,\u201d which might appear \u201cabnormal\u201d to an outsider looking in. For example, when studying undomesticated animals or uncivilized peoples, an outsider might characterize these ways of life as wild; however, the inhabitants of these \u201cwild\u201d groups might view modern-day civilizations as \u201cabnormal\u201d or \u201cwild.\u201d Additionally, when looking at the alternative definition of \u201cwild,\u201d in which \u201cwild\u201d is described as unrestrained or uncontrolled, it almost places a negative connotation on the inability to tame the \u201cwild.\u201d I would reply that \u201cwild\u201d is undeserving of this pessimistic view. Again, it is simply in the perspective of scholars and individuals in power that characteristics such as \u201cuncontrolled\u201d or \u201cunrestrained\u201d might be problematic to society. This issue is vital because terminology and labels such as \u201cwild,\u201d can have a polarizing effect on those who have been labeled as such, essentially othering and ostracizing them from \u201cnormal\u201d society. Therefore, it is essential to establish definitions that refrain from othering and utilize words, such as \u201cwild,\u201d in a careful context to avoid labeling people with harmful terms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
-Juliette Chartier<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When it comes to the definition of the term \u201cwild,\u201d many dictionaries would agree that \u201cwild\u201d means something along the lines of undomesticated species. For example, Merriam-Webster defines \u201cwild\u201d as \u201cnot inhabited or cultivated\u201d and \u201cnot subject to restraint or … Continue reading