Author Archives: olivias

Dewey and the War on Drugs

Every year, tens of thousands of Americans are sentenced and jailed for nonviolent drug offenses. These criminals are often victims of mandatory sentencing, a byproduct of the decades old and frankly, outdated, war on drugs. While I understand that the politicians of the past saw a link between crime and rising drug use, the failure of the war on drugs proves that the decriminalization of drugs is necessary. The laws once made sense, but as evidenced by the enormous prison population of America, they are leading to numerous negative consequences. These ridiculous drugs laws unfairly target the poor and minority communities as richer drug offenders often have the means to better lawyers and buy drugs from more discreet and safer places. As I have noted before, a penal legal system is not a productive one. We need a system in place for drug abusers that aims at reform, not jail time. Currently, our tax dollars are being used to house and feed thousands of harmless drug offenders while that money could instead be used to rehabilitate them within their own communities and provide resources for all. If we replace police force with education, we will see better results. Much like the successful no smoking campaign, the war on drugs should aim to educate, not force. An educated community is less likely to do drugs- or at least make more informed decisions on them.

Laws must be judged on their consequences, just like actions. The action of doing a drug affects only yourself and possibly your immediate family who may have to deal with your constant intoxication. However, the mandatory sentencing laws have countless negative consequences. These laws rip families and communities apart, force users to turn to dirty needles and sketchy drugs and push the drug market further into the black market. The role of the government is not to predict that doing drugs will hurt the community, it is to react. The government is needed to react to the workings of drug cartels, as those have many negative affects on the community in which they operate, but the government is not needed to react to the daily using of drugs on the personal level. Users only hurt themselves, sellers hurt many. Drug use is simply not a public matter, just as alcohol consumption by adults isn’t regulated by the government. If the citizen has effective media about drug use, much like cigarettes, the rate of drug use will naturally decline.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Dewey

Dewey vs. Citizen’s United

Throughout this election season, the American public has been subjected to the effects of Citizen’s United. As a liberal, I cannot support the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizen’s United vs. the FEC. Their decision, to allow for the continuation of electioneering by private corporations and non-profits, violates all the principles we as liberals hold. Not only does this law disproportionally favor the wealthy majority of the United States by allowing wealthy organizations to push their political messages upon uneducated voters, but it will inevitably lead to the dissemination of propaganda. If we allow the wealthy associations of America to create political ads we contribute to the trend of the uninformed voter. The voter who consumes propaganda instead of reasoned science and reports has the danger of voting in an uneducated manner. I have said before that science is the only way to beat the effect of propaganda, and the makers of these political ads are most definitely not political or social scientists.

In addition to the problem of propaganda, Citizen’s United begins an unhealthy relationship between the government and private associations. Corporate expenditures during campaigns lead to unfair associations between the ad’s funder and the politician, therefore excluding the public from law making. A politician who was supported by a certain corporation will likely lend an ear to their causes more than the public’s. This relationship will only continue the tradition of the ruling elite and oppressive organizations. If the government’s role is to be to represent and serve the people, taking money from minority interests will undoubtedly create obstacles between the public and elected officials. The public requires the government to protect them from these established corporations, not align with them. How is a government official expected to stand up for public interest to an oppressive corporation from which they received money to win the campaign in the first place?

Finally, here is my final piece of evidence against this wretched decision. We are living in an eclipse of the citizen, where voters are reluctant and uneducated. The political pageantry that films like Hillary: The Movie showcase leads our public to be more cynical than ever. Citizens lack community because they feel that their efforts be fruitless. If citizens had proper information instead of the theatrics in political ads, they would more effectively be able to decide upon laws that bring good consequences for the whole of the community.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Dewey