Author Archives: Briza

About Briza

Current International Relations major from Mcallen, Tx :)

False Analogies that Dehumanize People & Humanize Companies: Blog Post 4

Freiling, Nicholas. “Minimum Wage: Good Intentions, Bad Policy.” Values & Capitalism. valuesandcapitalism.com, Aug. 2013. Web. 11 Aug. 2015.

 

Nicholas Freiling is a blogger who argues that while there is public support for raising the minimum wage, this does not mean that it would be good for the American economy. To get his argument across, Freiling compares the labor of working class people to food being sold in a market. He states that “If the price of milk is capped at $1 per gallon, grocers will soon run out, as customers buy more than they need while prices are low.” Also, he states that “If the price of bread is not allowed to fall below $10 per loaf, grocers won’t be able to sell their stock as consumers will wait until prices drop to buy bread.” Freiling believes that these same ideas apply to the minimum wage and workers. He tells that since the minimum wage is $7.25 now there are more workers that want to work but yet there are not enough companies that can employ them. He concludes his analogy by comparing grocery store shoppers to businesses when he says “There is only so much money to go around, and—like the grocery store’s customers—businesses cannot spend more on wages than they earn in revenue.” He concludes his article by stating that while raising the minimum wage might sound like a good thing, it might not be in the United States’ best interest to do so.

Freiling’s argument against minimum wage is not very reasonable, especially towards the working class. For starters, he uses a false analogy by comparing people’s labor to products at a grocery store. His argument is wrong here because he is dehumanizing workers by comparing them to products that can be bought. His false analogy invokes a sort of sense of human trafficking or prostitution as if a company can walk into a store and decide that it wants to buy a human’s labor. Human trafficking and prostitution are illegal and while Freiling might not have been explicitly talking about the sale of humans, he was talking about the sale of their labor which are two things that are hard to distinguish from each other. Freiling is wrongly making workers seem like products that only serve for the benefit of companies. He completely ignores the fact that workers are human beings who labor to earn a fair living in order to survive.

Freiling takes his false analogy further by making companies appear like humans when he describes companies as being customers of a grocery store. A company is not one single living and breathing human made out of flesh that goes to the market. A company is made up of many people and different sectors that make it function. And while yes, some of the people that do make up the company have gone to the market, they do not shop in the name of their corporation. It is not legal for a single person to buy another person, so it is not right for a company to buy a worker and their labor as if the worker were a product at a grocery store. Freiling’s usage of analogies only weaken his argument and his own image by trivializing the fact that some people work hard and yet they still get paid a low minimum wage.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Blog Post 4

Fast-Food Workers to Strike to Super-Size Their Wages – Research Summary 4

Sneed, Tierney. “Fast-Food Workers to Strike to Super-Size Their Wages.” usnews.com. US News & World Report, 3 Sept. 2014. Web. 4 Aug. 2015.

The controversy I am discussing for my second essay is the raising of minimum wage. The text I chose relates to my first source because it gives exigency as to what was and still is going on in the U.S. when it comes to low wage workers.

I believe that U.S. News & World Report is a trusted source. Although the site is known more its world rankings of colleges and universities, these rankings are generally trusted and so by this standard I’m choosing to believe that its information is credible. Also since the site caters to a much broader audience than USA Today — which is evident from its title that states the source as providing a “World Report” — it has more pressure on itself to be more credible and truthful. Tierney Sneed, the author of the article, is credited in her U.S. News bio as being a “cultural and social issues reporter.” Her Twitter is also linked on her bio page and upon investigation, I discovered that her header is Nicki Minaj with a group of kids and she posts things that are mostly politically relevant with a bit of pop culture.  From looking at this as well as her other articles which mainly focus on politics, Sneed seems like a trusted reporter that cares about what she writes and is socially conscious. The article itself is very professionally written and informational. There are links to studies by places like The Center for Economic and Policy Research and the language in which it is written is very straightforward. What really gives the article credibility is the quotes the author includes from various pro minimum wage protesters and political officials.

In 2014, protesters were gathering across the country in front of fast food chains like Wendy’s and Burger King to protest in favor of raising minimum wage. The author, Tierney Sneed, includes a quote from President Obama that that states “America deserves a raise. Give America a raise.” Sneed goes on to explain that the protesters are seeking a fifteen dollar minimum wage. She cites a report by the Economic Policy institute that describes restaurant wages as being “significantly lower than those in other industries.” The author speaks with a man named Ronnie Kitchen who is protesting minimum wage as he works for Burger King and is “tired of living in poverty.” Sneed describes Kitchen’s anger with minimum wage as being fueled by the unfair pay difference between major restaurant chains’ CEOs and their workers. Employees plan on protesting at restaurants and holding press conferences in which they will voice their opinion over minimum wage and fast food chains. According to Sneed, the fast food industry is not happy with these protests and believe that labor unions are behind the employee unrest. The author highlights how the protests are causing a change in the United States. President Obama had been advocating for a raise in wages but his plans had been derailed by the National Restaurant Organization, and other organizations like it. These organizations argue that raising wages would “kill jobs and increase food prices.” Sneed describes states, such as Washington, being moved by these protests and a few politicians from both sides supporting the raising of wages.

Leave a Comment

Filed under RS 4

Volvo Advertisement

VolvoAd

5 Comments

Filed under Blog Post 3

Research Summary 3: Raising the Minimum Wage Is Common Sense

Jack Quinn, Mike Castle, Steve LaTourette, and Connie Morella. “Raising the Minimum Wage Is Common Sense: Column.” USA Today. Gannett, 09 Oct. 2014. Web. 29 July 2015.

The controversy related to this article is raising minimum wage. This source is relevant to the minimum wage debate because all four authors of the article were members of their respective states’ house of representatives; Jack Quinn represented New York, Mike Castle represented Delaware, Connie Morella represented Maryland, and Steve LaTourette represented Ohio.

I believe this article is a credible source over the minimum wage debate because as state representatives, the article’s authors have firsthand knowledge about the US and it’s inner-working economy. The speakers write in a credible way as they cite a lot of statistical data but also mention their political work as a way to make themselves seem more knowledgeable in the matter. The venue of the article is USA Today which is a widely known news source. Due to the fact that the source represents itself as the face of current US news and strives to do just that, it is respected by Americans and probably those in international communities that follow world news. The authors of the article embedded many links to websites of the sources where they got their information. This shows that the authors actually researched and thought out their argument instead of just stating their opinion with no facts. The authors approach their argument in a straightforward and responsible manner because they are appealing to their former colleagues who are politicians.

Jack Quinn, Mike Castle, Connie Morella, and Steve LaTourette are all former state representatives that are calling their former political colleagues to raise minimum wage all over the country. They start of by saying that when they worked in Congress, they all voted in support of raising the minimum wage and encouraged others to do so. The authors then explain that the “the last time Congress voted to raise the wage to its current rate of $7.25 an hour was seven years ago.” Since that time, things like groceries, gas, and college have all increased in price. The authors state that inflation had not been kept up with in terms of wage. They then note that low minimum wage isn’t mostly affecting teenagers but parents who’s “average age is 35” and have to support children. The authors explain the unfairness of people working long hours and yet still being “stuck in poverty.” When they worked in Congress, the authors paired “minimum wage increases with pro-tax reform.” This strategy was met with majority approval. The authors argue that it’s time for the “Republican Caucus to take back our party” by addressing the issue of minimum wage accordingly. They explain that even an increase of the minimum wage to $10.10 would allow “one in five US workers” to benefit. In conclusion of their argument, the authors call on their former colleagues to raise the minimum wage because its “simple common sense.

4 Comments

Filed under RS 3

Mexican and World Culture Enthusiast

I made this because I miss having really good Mexican food.

My home is the Rio Grande Valley where Mexican culture is everywhere. My own Mexican American culture is what has shaped my life into what it is today. Growing up in a heavily Mexican and Spanish environment is what made me bilingual by the time I was four years old. Having Mexican heritage in my veins is what gave me my skin color and my brown hair. My heritage is everything about me. Being in such a different environment such as Austin for a few weeks has really made me put into perspective how much I rely on my culture. Back home, really good breakfast tacos were at every corner store and you could always smell the mouthwatering scent of fajitas being grilled on a Sunday afternoon.  Now, it seems as if I’m on the constant hunt for really good tacos and a place where I can speak Spanglish and still be understood.

My friends and my family are back home and we’re all connected by our heritage. Some of my greatest pleasures are eating authentic Mexican food and dancing guapangos at quinceaneras. All this is because of the culture in which I was raised. I’m very proud to be Mexican and when others generalize the Mexican people as “criminals and rapists” such as Donald Trump did a while ago that’s very insulting to me. Whenever I turn on the tv and see Mexicans being portrayed as workers for hire at a local Home Depot, maids, or street fruit salesman I am offended. It bothers me that American society generally likes to pigeonhole different races and ethnicities just so that they can put people in a box and not have to really take the time to get to know them.

cultures_around_the_worldBecause of the stereotypes I’ve seen of my people in society, I’ve become more aware of the stereotypes that all races and cultures have associated with them. Pretty much every nationality in the world has a negative misconception about them. This led me to become more interested in discovering the truth about world cultures and become a culture enthusiast. This is why I want to study international relations and global studies because in order for two countries to work diplomatically, they have to understand each other culturally. I’ve never really experienced a stereotype because I’m interested in world culture but I have gotten judged for wanting to study international relations. Sometimes people don’t really understand why I would want to study other world regions or they believe that I don’t value my own culture enough. But that is not the case. The fact that I love my culture so much makes me want to reach out and discover the richness of other people’s heritage.

There are two organizations on campus that have really interested me and fit what I see myself as. The first is the Campus Events + Entertainment Mexican American Culture Organization. This organization hold events that celebrate Mexican culture such as Dia De Los Muertos and Mexican food.

https://utexas.collegiatelink.net/organization/campuseventsmexicanamericanculture

The second organization I found is the International Affairs Society that holds meetings to discuss world events and hosts speakers from different backgrounds that discuss international topics.

https://utexas.collegiatelink.net/organization/internationalaffairssociety

2 Comments

Filed under Blog Post 2

Research Summary 2 – Smokey Dare: Maybe it’s time to regulate marijuana like cigarettes

Williams,  Patrick. “‘Smokey dare: Maybe it’s time to regulate marijuana like cigarettes’.” Alt-PressWatch, The Dallas Observer, 20 Aug. 2009. Web. 19 Jul. 2015.

Patrick Williams is a writer for the Dallas Observer. In ‘”‘Smokey dare: Maybe it’s time to regulate marijuana like cigarettes’,” published by The Dallas Observer in August 2009, Williams interviews Craig Johnson who is head of ProtectYouth, a lobbying and nonprofit group. Williams initially establishes that while Craig Johnson is interested in legalizing marijuana, he still does not believe that children should be using the drug.

Johnson believes that by legalizing marijuana, the US will be able to regulate and tax it more effectively and in doing so limiting the access of it to minors and youth. Williams then explains Johnson and his groups efforts in attempting to legalize marijuana. The group had been collecting data from the government that shows the effects of tobacco regulation in the 90s. Since the government put pressure on tobacco companies to stop pandering their products to youth, the result was that fewer high school aged students are using tobacco. But, as this number went down, the number of youth that are using marijuana has stayed the same and even surpassed those who use tobacco, even though cannabis is still illegal.

Williams then cites an online source to state that the number of tobacco merchants who sold to minors had decreased 11.3 percent up to 2009 because of government regulations. Yet still, regardless of the amount of marijuana arrests made, the price of marijuana has mostly stayed the same and young people are using the drug the without decrease.

Johnson states that the US is more able to regulate the tobacco market than the marijuana market because the former is legal. “Effective regulation beats our current system of ineffective criminalization any day,” he argues. Williams agrees with Johnson’s ideals and then mentions the benefits legalizing marijuana could have on the government as well as young people. “Demographics are changing, old people are giving up seats of power and a younger, more reform-minded generation (you know, stoners) is taking the reins,” Williams states.

Ultimately, this article is arguing for the legalization of marijuana so that the government can effectively regulate it and in turn keep it out of reach of youth. This article would be good for anymore comparing marijuana with tobacco in their own argument in terms of teen use and government policies and economy.

1 Comment

Filed under RS 2