Part I:
Of the many texts assigned on the syllabus this semester, I believe the two that stuck with me the most were the Guy Fieri review and the piece about lobsters.
The Guy Fieri review was so memorable, in my opinion, because the writer was ripping the restaurant, Guy’s American Kitchen and Bar, to pieces. Pete Wells, while seeming like a pretentious prick in his writing, used only questions to break down his experience in Fieri’s restaurant. His style criticized each and every aspect of the 500-seater restaurant in Time Square and simultaneously kept entertainment alive. I will say, however, I’m glad I’m not Guy Fieri.
I suppose this particular review stuck in my brain because it reshaped the way I considered restaurant reviews. Prior to this particular review, while I understood there were good and bad reviews, they were fairly straight forward, almost boring, simply written short snippets of text. By using only questions and stinging sarcasm, Wells changed the game in reviews.
The piece that I chose as part of my outside reading that I found most memorable would have to be heat maps, the subject of my original composition. After spending so much time researching a number of heat maps, their physical traits, and their greater significance, I find myself having a greater appreciation for food writing, or ‘writing.’ What these heat maps taught me was that food writing does not necessarily mean you are reading words on a page about food; rather, food writing can be videos, short stories, and even a text-map hybrid, like the heat maps.
Part II:
I think the major take-away I’ve had from the Rhetoric of Food course is that the rhetoric of food does not limit itself to analyzing writing on a page. Rhetoric of food forms itself depending on the author, the situation, and the audience.
For example, if a college student is looking to create some sort of food writing for fellow college students, it is likely that the author will first take time to understand the style and taste of his/her audience, and then take steps from there. If students prefer not to have a lot of extensive reading, perhaps the food writing prepared for the college audience will result in a video rather than text on a page.
The rhetoric of food also looks beyond what is being served on the plate in front of you. The rhetoric of food, in whatever medium it is being delivered, explains who the food is for, what the purpose of the food is, and usually the places the food came from—the “food cultures” bring life to the food and allows audience members to hear its story.