The article that I enjoyed the most was the Fieri review. I thought it was interesting in how harsh it was. This reviewer came across as completely biased to the point where it seemed he was reviewing the man rather than the restaurant. However, at the same time it was still pretty humorous for how direct it was. While it was entertaining to read this, the sarcasm and tone took away from the actual message as well as the author’s credibility.
I chose to read “19 Lazy But Brilliant Recipes That Won’t Let You Down, ” a Tasty by Buzzfeed article. This was my mentor text I used to guide my original composition. This article is great, because it was written for millennials and the content was intended to be sharable, which were two characteristics important to my writing. It also promotes a simplicity to cooking which is very valuable.
At the beginning of the semester I would have thought that the rhetoric of food was just simply writing about what we eat. I thought it pretty much would be cookbooks and restaurant reviews. As the semester progressed it became apparent that who was writing was also just as important as what was being written. Also, the content of what was being produced took on many more forms than what I expected. It encompasses everything from cookbooks to Tasty videos to Buzzfeed articles. I never realized how many different genres can be used in food writing. All in all, I learned that the rhetoric of food is the way in which we express and analyze our experiences with food.