The rhetoric of food does not have one simple cut and paste definition. It is a very flexible term that expands across many mediums and genres of texts. Perhaps one of the oldest and longest lasting genres, the rhetoric of food can range from videos, movies, reviews, recipes and even stories- along with much more. Our class has proven that there is no set thing that is the rhetoric of food, but we have demonstrated that the rhetoric of food is meant to be shared and enjoyed by everyone. It is a subject that wants to inform, and in some cases, entertain as well. It is a subject that is important and prevalent in every culture and society, and has informed us about certain cultures and their histories. The rhetoric of food will continue to live on as long as humans are still alive and eating, and will continue to be one of the most universal and basic human connections.
Author: Savannah
Favorite Texts Wrap Up
My favorite thing that I read, -well watched- was the documentary “Super-Size Me”. I really enjoyed this because the subject was very interesting to me, but it also was able to expand the rhetoric of food from off the page and onto the big screen. Having this available in a medium that many Americans enjoy made this text very accessible to a wide audience and probably was much more effective in communicating its message rather than if it had been an essay or other written form. I also enjoyed this text because it truly showed the dangers of processed food and the negative effects it can have on the body.
A text that I chose that I really enjoyed was the YouTube video, “Epic Rap Battles of History: Gordon Ramsay vs. Julia Child”, that I used in my annotated bibliography. This video was really fun to watch and analyze and further proved that: 1. Annotated bibliographies do not have to be boring, monotonous pieces of writing and 2. The rhetoric of food has an expansive amount of types of text, not just recipes and reviews. This video also did a great job of comparing the old and new types of celebrity chefs and how things have drastically changed in food television.
Restaurant Wars
Read about the battles here!
Hybrid Genre Conventions
While I am still needing to form my exact genre, I have an idea of doing a hybrid genre that is between an informal review and a best and worst list. My idea is to either pit different restaurants with similar cuisine genres against one another and see who is supreme and who falls short, or pick one type of cuisine genre, try different restaurants that serve this genre, and make a list that ranks them from best to worst. While I decide between these two genres’, I have been researching different food writing topics that I think would help both of my options. I’ve been mainly focusing on finding formal and informal reviews and articles that rank restaurants. I have also been wanting to find both positive and negative reviews.
During my research, I found things that worked and did not work and have helped me get a clearer idea of what my topic should include. It seems that the best rankings and reviews keep the audience in suspense, meaning that they save the big reveal till the very end; whether this be through putting the best restaurant as the last slide like in the “Best Seafood” article, or giving your final opinion, and the whole point of the article, at the very end as seen in “Chipotle vs. Qdoba”.
I also discovered that shorter is sometimes better. As a typical person has a small attention span, the reviews need to be short. While the “Best Seafood” article does a good job of this, they seem to fall short on overall length as the audience has to click through 31 slides. The review on Montana’s Trail House seems to achieve a nice balance of a formal review, written in a way that creates imagery in a reader’s head while also providing a lot of information in a concise amount of space. I also enjoyed this review because it used more than one sense; I was able to conjure images and smells, albeit in an unfavorable way towards Montana’s, thus creating a more interesting and powerful review.
What should it contain?
Sometimes:
• Save the best for last
• History of the restaurant
Always:
• Be aware of your audience and the length of your post
• Write with the senses in mind
• Write about what a reader would want to know: Ease of access, price, availability, location, food and service quality, and overall dining experience
• Visual Component: Actual images of the food served or the restaurant itself
Sources:
- Chipotle vs. Qdoba
- Best Seafood Restaurants in the U.S.
- Montana’s Trail House Brings Morally Hazardous Appalachian Cuisine to Brooklyn
- 2016 Top 25
Questions:
- What would you be more interested in reading? Battle between restaurants or ranking of one type of cuisine?
- Would you rather click through a slideshow or scroll through a text post?
- Do you like in depth reviews or short “this was good because…” reviews?
- Is there any other additional information you are looking for or wanting from a review/ranking?
- How can a reviewer not come off as condescending/sarcastic when writing a negative review?
Savannah’s Mentor Text
“The Teen Chef is Proof Kids Should Stay Out of the Kitchen” Steve Cuozzo
This mentor text is a rather critical review aimed particularly at a chef, whom Cuozzo argues, is in turn the restaurant itself. This text has positive and negative aspects too it. While it does a good job in articulating why his experience was poor and what needed to be approved upon, Cuozzo comes off as very condescending towards the young chef. Having this ageism weaving through his review makes him seem highly biased from the very beginning, titling his review “The teen chef is proof kids should stay out of the kitchen”. However, considered the location and pricing of this restaurant, one could argue that Cuozzo’s intended audience, a group of wealthy and exclusivity-driven adult, would agree with his bias. They want a highly knowledgeable chef that can be seen through his talent and through his years.
This text functions as a good example of a review because it shows that a bias can actually work for you if your intended audience has a similar viewpoint. It also demonstrated ways in which the reviewee can improve upon his craft, rather than just complaining about everything.
Cuozzo, Steve. “This Teen Chef Is Proof Kids Should Stay out of the Kitchen.” New York Post. N.p., 30 Sept. 2015. Web. 21 Mar. 2017.
The Evolution of Food Media
The Problem With Watching Too Many Cooking Shows
Ferdman makes a bold claim in his article by stating that, “As Americans cook less and less, they seem compelled to watch people cook more and more.” Ferdman creates a case around this claim, arguing through studies that the more one watches food television, the less healthy they eat. He also shows that people who watch food television and cook are even more prone to eating and cooking less healthy. Ferdman ends his article with a quote that sums up his rational towards the subject; “Restaurant quality meals really shouldn’t be eaten every day.”
Ferdman is taking a much more aggressive viewpoint on food television compared to other writers. From the beginning of his article, Ferdman takes a strong stance, not exactly against food television, but of the audience of food television. Ferdman is exposing what happens after the television is turned off, and studies show it isn’t exercise. Ferdman does seem to have a bias against unhealthy eating, calling out (ex) Food Network chef, Paula Deen for her insatiable use of butter in many of her dishes. This article tackles the eating or consuming category of food writing due to the texts hard stance against eating as if you were a Food Network chef. Ferdman demonizes the fatty, oversized food that has now become a popular staple of food television as it is normalizing this food; viewers are seeing these foods being eaten every day and in turn figure that they can eat like that every day as well. Ferdman emphasizes that if one wants to eat like a television chef, do it in moderation.
Ferdman, Roberto A. “The problem with watching too many cooking shows.” The Washington Post. WP Company, 18 Mar. 2015. Web. 2 Mar. 2017.
The Feeding Tube: How Food Television Changed The Way We Eat
Platt’s article discusses how food television has changed and how this change can be seen in American culture. “More people on average watch the Food Network than CNN, and when you throw in other hit food shows (No Reservations on the Travel Channel, Top Chef on Bravo, Kitchen Nightmares on the BBC and its American spinoff on Fox), you have an audience that dwarfs almost anything outside of ESPN.” With this quote in mind, one can begin to imagine the broad scope that food television now has in America. Adding to this line of thought, Platt introduces the idea that food television personalities are now not just “cooks” but have become food celebrities to the American people. Platt ends the article with a celebrative tone, telling his audience to just enjoy this “golden age of food television…because it is here to stay.”
Throughout this article, Platt’s mood seems to shift. While at the beginning he seems to be calling for reform of food television, the end has a drastically different tone in which he gives the impression that change is bound to happen in every industry and we just have to learn to go along with the change. This text mainly falls into the selling or marketing food writing category due to mainly discussing food television and its corresponding personalities, as they relate and influence the American home. Food television can now be found in almost every home, whether it is directly through the television or through items that were either created, shown, or endorsed by food celebrities. Food media is here to stay.
Platt, Adam. “The Feeding Tube: How Food Television Changed the Way We Eat.” Grub Street. N.p., 24 Oct. 2011. Web. 01 Mar. 2017.
We Spend More Time Watching Food On TV Than We Do Cooking It
Mills’ article gives an eye-opening view on food media and its relationship with actual cooking in the home. She begins her article stating a somewhat shocking fact, “The average adult spends more time watching, scrolling and reading about food on social media that they do cooking their daily meals.” She ends her article on a somber note, rehashing an interview with media psychologist, Emma Kenny. Kenny comments on the massive amounts of food media that is now available to the public, but despite this people are still not actually cooking in the home.
In Mills’ article, she gives a lot of good facts and information about how food media is all prevalent in many people’s lives, but she doesn’t add much commentary; rather she quotes others to get her point across: food media has changed from informational and informative, to more of a leisurely pastime, no longer used to help the at home cook.
Looking at her bias, she is not seemingly swaying to any argument at the beginning, moreover she is just trying to get to information out to her readers. Near the end of the article she does appear to have more of an opinion, as the use of the direct quotes seem to be talking for her. Her goal from this article is trying to get readers to become aware of how much food media is in our lives, and introduce the idea that cooking is not just for professionals and is not that expensive. Her overall stance seems to be advocating for a change in how the public uses food media. Mills seems to want to get back into informational food media rather than have it be the leisurely activity it has turned into.
Mills, Emma. “We spend more time watching food on TV than we do cooking it.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 22 Sept. 2016, www.telegraph.co.uk/food-and-drink/news/we-spend-more-time-watching-food-on-tv-than-we-do-cooking-it/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2017.
Epic Rap Battles of History: Gordon Ramsay vs. Julia Child
This YouTube video, created by the user account “Epic Rap Battles of History”, pairs famed, hot-head chef Gordon Ramsay against the women who revolutionized TV cooking, Julia Child. They rap battle against each other, throwing lines with layers of multiple meanings at one another. The intended audience is a very vast group of people, as anyone who watches YouTube or is interested in food media may come across this; as of March 7, 2017, the original YouTube video has over 20.5 million views.
The creators of this “Epic Rap Battle” seem to be very fair and unbiased. Almost every word spoken has an under lying meaning, whether it is purely food based or more cut-throat and personal. Each character makes great points against the other and it is truly not just a one-sided battle. This document can fall into several food writing categories, but it most seems to follow the idea of celebrating or memorializing food media. This battle is pretty much pitting old versus new of food television, and has two of some of these most historic and branded chefs of the eras to demonstrate the drastic change that has occurred. This battle not only brings the history of food media to popular culture, but makes it fun to learn about through an underused medium.
“Gordon Ramsay vs Julia Child. Epic Rap Battles of History – Season 5.” YouTube, YouTube, 18 May 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=99-n42Xb6NQ. Accessed 28 Feb. 2017.
In this text, Dawn discusses the evolution of Food television. Dawn claims that while cooking shows evolve away from professional chefs showing the audience how to cook and more into reality television with do-it-yourself amateurs, the professionals are “evolving themselves out of a job.”
While not giving any defining opinion, Dawn seems to be judgmental towards the food television industry. The use of several quotes show his judgment and perhaps his longing for food television to return back to its roots: teaching the public rather than purely entertaining. In his longing, Dawn demonstrates features of the advocating for a change category. He leaves the reader with a sense of wariness towards having food television become just another reality television market.
Dawn, Randee. “TV’s Food Show Evolution.” Variety. N.p., 21 June 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2017.
This article, with an anonymous author, gives an informational history of some of the most popular food radio shows of the 20th century. In looking at the evolution of food media, radio is important to examine because it is the real beginning of food media. While television has been a widespread medium, it wouldn’t be anything if radio hadn’t done it first. This article shows that, due to the time period, food radio was intended for women. Food radio was usually intertwined with other homemaker radio shows, such as “housekeeping tips, child-rearing, and even laundry tips.” As food radio began to progress as its own genre, many brands began to endorse shows such as PET Milk and The Mary Lee Taylor Program. Interestingly enough, a household name to this day, Betty Crocker, had a radio show and school all in one with the Betty Crocker Cooking School of the Air, eventually adapting the show to NBC in 1927.
While this article demonstrates traits of the memorialization category by reviewing the origins of food media, it also fits into the category of making. While this article doesn’t show a recipe, it does demonstrate how making food and widespread recipes became popularized and distributed in an era before television or the internet. This article shows that food media is, and will continue to be, a part of the American way of life, no matter the era.
“Cooking in Old Time Radio.” Cooking in Old Time Radio | Old Time Radio. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Feb. 2017.
10 Years On: How Yelp Has Completely Changed the Restaurant Industry
Gardiner’s article claims that Yelp has given the public a forum to express their own critical voice, but questions whether that empowerment has gone too far. Gardiner seems to be writing towards the users of Yelp, with the biggest age bracket being 35-45 years old and people who earn more than $100k per year.
Gardiner’s opinion on food media, specifically the review site Yelp, is neither positive nor negative. He is able to show both sides of the argument, though he does give a disclaimer about the business’ ethics and potential consequences of having everyone be a critic, swaying him slightly towards the more conservative side of food media. This text falls into multiple food writing categories, but specifically encompassing marketing and advocating for a change due to the nature of Yelp and its powerful influence over the service industry. Gardiner seems to want the readers to be aware of the power that the consumer now holds, and not to be overly critical on seemingly petty things. Gardiner questions the practice of giving everyone a critical voice, and warns his readers to be wary as well; just because everyone is a critic, does not make them a good critic.
“No one cares if a particular McDonald’s gets a 2-star review. It’s McDonald’s. If the little mom-and-pop burger spot around the corner gets pelted with poor reviews on account of a lack of parking or that a well-done burger took “too long”, however, it could be put at risk. Call it an evolutionary phase of consumer capitalism, or the devolution of the “expert” opinion.”
Gardiner, Ross. “10 Years On: How Yelp Has Completely Transformed the Restaurant Industry.” Obsev, 23 June 2014, www.obsev.com/food/10-years-how-yelp-has-completely-transformed-restaurant-industry.html. Accessed 1 Mar. 2017.
The Yelp Factor: Are Consumer Reviews Good for Business?
Blanding’s article examines one of the biggest online review sites: Yelp; based upon research done by Michael Luca. The article has many similar opinions as Gardiner’s, but Blanding has a less cautious stance. While he does highlight some of the issues that Yelp and other review sites suffer from, he also proves the weight that online reviews carry. Using Luca’s research, Blanding shows that Yelp not only influences where people go, but what businesses survive.
Blanding keeps a very unbiased opinion in his article. He presents his and Luca’s information in a very open atmosphere, and allows for both positive and negative facts to be shared. He seems to be intending this article for Yelp users, as he wants to inform them of the full truth behind Yelp and its reviews. Due to the subject matter, this article is categorized into selling and marketing, as Yelp is one of the most popular ways to be able to advertise online. While reviews are still taken into deep consideration when purchasing anything, the importance of online reviews are growing every day.
Blanding, Michael. “The Yelp Factor: Are Consumer Reviews Good for Business?” HBS Working Knowledge. N.p., 24 Oct. 2011. Web. 1 Mar. 2017.
Savannah’s Research Topic
The topic for my annotated bibliography is essentially “The evolution of food media and its relationship with the American household.” While this is a very broad topic, I do plan to narrow in on specific sects of subjects as my research progresses. I am wanting to explore how food media has evolved throughout history, while also including a comparison with food radio, food television and finally food on social media.
While I first thought I would really focus a lot on food television, my research has brought me to find a lot of interesting articles about food on social media; continuing on, I want to develop more inquiries surrounding food on social media, including how review apps (such as Yelp), “foodies” on Instagram, and YouTube had changed America’s perception about food and the food eating/making experience. Already I have found several articles that show the impact some of these sites have had on the food industry, including “10 Years On: How Yelp Has Completely Transformed the Restaurant Industry” and “The Yelp Factor: Are Consumer Reviews Good for Business?”
While social media has opened a lot of new avenues for me to venture into, I also want to explore food television and its relationship with the American household, moreover how America had influenced and changed food television. While this subtopic will explore content on television, I also want to compare and contrast modern “food celebrities” with those from the beginning of food television and radio. From first glance it is clear that the content and personalities are vastly different between the era’s, but I want to see if there is a reason or speculation as to what has caused those changes. So far I have found several helpful sites that discuss this topic such as, “How food television is changing America” and “The Evolution Of Food On TV.”
Overall my biggest complication is finding sources. While there are many articles I do have to sift through a lot of nonsense articles that don’t give much reasoning or behind their claims. Is there a better way to do this other than just using Google? Also, because of the nature of my topic and subsequent subtopics, I am just struggling to narrow everything down into a cohesive argument. Are there any topics that seem more interesting from a readers perspective? My bibliography is going to cover a lot and is hopefully going to show how why food media is not only popular, but has constantly stayed relevant while so many other genres have died out. This bibliography is not just about food making but also the role food has on society, and vice versa.
Beginning Topic Research
When this assignment was first announced, my mind started turning with all the possible avenues that I could explore. I first began my research by simply googling different areas of interest and seeing what sources came back. I wanted a topic that would allow me to explore not just one particular sect of food, but I also knew I needed to have a clear idea of what I was researching and exploring.
Within the last few days I have decided upon my topic and am just starting to gather resources. The inspiration from my topic has come from my love of The Food Network. I used to watch cooking shows when I was little, and although many of the same stars are featured on the network, the premise of the network has changed from educational to more of a reality game show network. This paradigm shift made me question how television cooking as a whole has changed through the years, including before television was even a household item. I also want to bring this question to the present day and see how the internet has changed the dynamic as well.
In the light research that I have done, I can already tell there has been a drastic change. From the type of shows the food television produces, to the status of the chefs of these shows; Chefs are now full-fledged celebrities with copious amounts of projects under their belts. So for the article, How food television is changing America, has been a great starting point in my research.
Some questions I have are: What questions do people have about this topic? What are some good resources to find scholarly information?
Apple Rum Raisin Bread Pudding
This dish brings me back home to the cool winter nights in Seattle. It can be easily heated up in the microwave, and I love to serve it over a rich vanilla bean ice cream. Seattle in the winter is really cold, grey and gloomy, but this dish was able to warm me up from the inside out.
This dish has developed and changed as I have grown up. At one time I scoffed at bread pudding because it didn’t seem, or sound, like a true dessert. However, over time I grew to accept, love and eventually alter it to better enhance the flavors to fit my pallet. This recipe is one of my favorites as it combines sweet fruit with savory rum to create a medley in your mouth. While there are recipes without rum, I have recently turned 21 and have begun cooking with more alcohol to develop richer and more complex flavors. I have also provided a sauce recipe, while it is not a necessary part, I always enjoy sauces with my food; make if desired.
Yields: About 8-10 Servings
Ingredients:
Apple and Raisin Mixture:
- ½ Cup Raisins
- 2 Tbsp Spiced Rum
- 1 Large Apple, peeled, cored, sliced thin into ½ inch pieces
- 2 Tbsp Butter
- Dash of Ground Cinnamon
- About 9-10, ½ inch slices of French Brioche, cubed into ½ inch pieces
Bread Pudding:
- 1 tsp Ground Cinnamon, plus extra
- 3 Cups Milk
- 3 Tbsp Butter
- 1 tsp Vanilla Extract
- 1 tsp Ground Cinnamon
- ¾ Cup Brown Sugar, packed
- 4 eggs, beaten
(Optional) Sauce:
- 1 Cup Brown Sugar, Packed
- ½ Cup Butter
- ½ Cup Whipping Cream
- 2 Tbsp Spice Rum
- ¾ tsp Ground Cinnamon
Instructions:
Bread Pudding:
First Prepare the apple and Raisin Mixture
- Place 1 Tbsp of spiced rum in microwave safe bowl and stir in raisins
- Microwave bowl for 30 seconds, and stir afterwards
- Let raisins sit and absorb rum while preparing apple mixture.
- In a medium size saucepan, melt butter over medium heat
- Stir in apple pieces, 1 Tbsp spiced rum, dash of cinnamon, and raisin mixture. Raise heat to medium high.
- Cook until apples are soft and slightly browned, stirring occasionally. (About 10 minutes)
- Remove from heat and combine with bread cubes in a large bowl. Light fold together.
Next create the custard part of the bread pudding.
- In a large saucepan over medium heat, combine milk, butter, vanilla, cinnamon, and brown sugar. Simmer until sugar dissolves and mixture is smooth, whisking occasionally.
- Once mixture is smooth remove from heat and let cool for about 5 minutes. Then combine with bread, apples and raisins in your large bowl. Lightly fold together and let sit for about 30 minutes to allow the bread to absorb the liquid. Bread should be soggy.
Preheat oven to 350 degrees F
- Add beaten eggs to bowl and stir in till well combined.
- Pour mixture into buttered 1 ½ quart baking dish.
- Bake uncovered for 50 minutes.
Instructions for Sauce:
- Stir Brown Sugar and butter in large saucepan over medium heat until melted and smooth
- Add cream, rum, and cinnamon and let simmer
- Simmer until sauce thickens and slightly reduces. (Be careful not to reduce too much or sauce will thicken too much, if this happens just add about a tablespoon of cream until sauce thins out to desired texture.)
- Serve Warm
Adapted and Inspired from:
All Recipes, Rum Raisin Bread Pudding with Warm Vanilla Sauce
Epicurious, Spiced Rum Sauce
Jen Segal, Apple Rum Raisin Bread Pudding
Patrick and Gina Neely, Rum Raisin Bread Pudding
The Art of Recipes
Food is a part of every life. Other than being a necessity for living, food evokes certain emotions and memories that are otherwise impossible to capture. Through the art of recipes, authors of all different cultures and backgrounds are able to offer a piece of themselves through food.
Authors write recipes to share with others. Whether it has been passed down in your family from your great-grandmother or from a world renowned chef, recipes are created to share. Food has always brought people together whether it be through celebration, solemnness, or just because people are hungry. Food can also be used to unite people together as different cultures have unique flavors and techniques that bring people together; although you may not understand each other, food is a universal language.
When analyzing the genre of recipes, there are usually three elements that are found in nearly all published works; an introduction, a list of ingredients, and directions. Though other elements can be added, this is the genre standard.
The introduction is the most personal section of any recipe. In this section, the author has the most freedom to personalize the recipe and truly make is their own. The introduction should not just be anecdotal though, it should also describe the dish in some way. The next section is usually the ingredients. This is typically the most impersonal part of a recipe, as it usually is just a list; however, some authors also use this space to give their readers alternative ingredients, allowing for different types of readers to still use their recipe. Marcella Hazan does this beautifully in her book Essentials of Classic Italian Cooking in her Pesto recipe. Hazan is aware that different levels of cooks are going to read her recipes, and that not have wants or has a mortar. By giving an alternative, more modern recipe, she broadens her selected audience. Finally, the author gives directions on how to create the dish. Using the introduction as a way to describe the dish through words or photos, as seen in the recipe for kung pao chicken in the book Phoenix Claws and Jade Trees by Kian Lam Kho, the reader should have an idea of what they are making. While the introduction should set-up the dish though, the directions should be the clearest part to read in a recipe. A great example of very clear directions is from this bruschetta recipe. This recipe breaks the dish down into three parts, allowing for the audience to easily follow along and create the three separate parts in their own time. While this recipe clearly explains how to make each step, some recipes will not explain things that may be simple knowledge to more experienced cooks, ultimately alienating more novice cooks.
Although these elements are almost always prevalent in any recipe, having these features does not always make a good recipe. Having now examined and read several types of recipes, I have learned about my preferences in a recipe and have seen recipes that are just bad. I prefer introductions that give a short anecdote that ties in with the dish. However, having a long introduction doesn’t make it a bad recipe. In my opinion, a good recipe is one that can be followed and properly executed by a novice cook. One of my favorite dishes that I have been making since I was about 11 is a take on this scalloped potatoes au gratin recipe. While any recipe with French roots sounds more complicated than it usually is, this recipe is very easy to follow and requires minimal ingredients and tools.
Recipes are becoming more and more accessible due to the internet. This allows for different cultures and authors to reach a wider audience. However, this has not changed the format of recipes. Introductions, ingredients and directions are almost always going to be the foundation to any good recipe. Food will always be a part of life, and with that, so will recipes.